Expanding Telehealth Access Among Rural Populations: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Adoption and Outcomes

Abstract

Background: Telehealth has emerged as an essential tool to improve access to health services, particularly among populations with limited healthcare resources. Rural areas face unique barriers—such as provider shortages, transportation challenges, and limited broadband infrastructure—that make telehealth interventions especially relevant.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the adoption of telehealth among rural populations and assess the effects of telehealth use on healthcare access and patient outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study using electronic health record (EHR) data from four rural clinics (quantitative component) and semi-structured interviews with patients and providers (qualitative component). Quantitative measures included rates of telehealth utilization, no-show rates, and selected clinical outcomes. Qualitative themes centered on barriers to telehealth adoption and perceived benefits for patients and providers.

Results: Overall telehealth use increased by 43% between 2019 and 2021, accompanied by a 12% reduction in no-show rates. Qualitative findings indicated that convenience, cost savings, and reduced travel time were key facilitators of telehealth uptake. However, limited broadband access and lack of technological literacy remained significant barriers.

Conclusions: Telehealth adoption in rural areas can improve healthcare utilization and patient outcomes. Targeted policy interventions, including broadband expansion and training programs, are essential to sustain growth in telehealth and reduce health disparities.

Introduction

Rural communities in many regions face distinct obstacles to accessing timely healthcare. Among these obstacles are long travel distances to healthcare facilities, limited availability of specialized services, and lower socioeconomic status. Telehealth—the use of telecommunications and digital technologies to deliver healthcare at a distance—has shown promise as a strategy to mitigate these barriers. Telehealth can offer more convenient healthcare services, reduce transportation costs, and potentially lower missed-appointment rates.

Despite these potential benefits, adoption in rural settings has been inconsistent. Concerns about inadequate internet connectivity, reimbursement policies, and patient and provider acceptance frequently impede telehealth deployment. This study seeks to fill a gap in understanding how telehealth adoption affects patient outcomes and to explore the facilitators and barriers to its implementation in rural healthcare settings.

Methods

Study Design

We employed a mixed-methods approach combining a retrospective analysis of EHR data (quantitative) with semi-structured interviews of patients and providers (qualitative). This design allowed for a comprehensive assessment of telehealth’s impact on access, utilization, and clinical outcomes.

Setting and Sample

• Quantitative Data: Collected from four rural primary care clinics in the Midwest. We examined de-identified records for all adult patients (age ≥18) who had at least one telehealth visit or an in-person visit during the period from January 2019 to December 2021.
• Qualitative Data: Conducted 15 semi-structured interviews with patients who had used telehealth at least once, and 10 interviews with healthcare providers (physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners) at the same clinics.

Data Collection

1. EHR Review: We extracted data on patient demographics (age, sex, insurance status, ZIP code), visit type (telehealth vs. in-person), and selected clinical outcomes (e.g., blood pressure control in hypertensive patients, glycemic control in diabetic patients).
2. Interviews: Semi-structured interview guides included questions about experiences with telehealth, perceived benefits and challenges, and suggestions for improvement.

Outcome Measures

• Telehealth Utilization Rate: Proportion of total visits conducted via telehealth over time.
• No-Show Rate: Percentage of missed appointments, comparing telehealth visits versus in-person visits.
• Clinical Outcomes: Changes in condition-specific measures (blood pressure for hypertension, HbA1c levels for diabetes) over the study period.
• Qualitative Themes: Emergent themes (e.g., convenience, technical challenges, policy barriers) identified via thematic analysis.

Data Analysis

• Quantitative: Descriptive and inferential statistics. We used chi-square tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables.
• Qualitative: Transcribed interviews were coded using an open coding approach. Two researchers independently coded transcripts and discussed discrepancies until consensus was reached. Common themes were identified and mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to contextualize facilitators and barriers.

Results

Quantitative Findings

1. Increased Adoption: From 2019 to 2021, telehealth visits rose from 5% to 48% of all appointments, an overall increase of 43 percentage points.
2. Reduced No-Shows: Patients who had telehealth visits exhibited a 12% lower no-show rate compared to those who only had in-person visits (p < 0.01).
3. Clinical Outcomes: Among patients with hypertension, the proportion achieving blood pressure control (BP < 140/90 mmHg) increased from 60% to 68% (p = 0.04). For patients with diabetes, average HbA1c levels fell from 8.2% to 7.9% (p = 0.05).

Qualitative Findings

Four major themes emerged from the interviews:

1. Convenience and Cost Savings
   Patients frequently cited reduced travel time, flexible scheduling, and decreased out-of-pocket costs (e.g., for gas) as reasons for preferring telehealth visits.
2. Technology Barriers
   Many respondents struggled with unfamiliar digital platforms and inadequate technical support. Older adults, in particular, expressed challenges navigating the telehealth software.
3. Limited Broadband
   Unstable or slow internet connections in rural areas inhibited the use of video-based telehealth, forcing some patients to rely on audio-only consultations.
4. Provider Acceptance
   While initially hesitant, many clinicians acknowledged that telehealth provided valuable continuity of care. They emphasized the importance of institutional and policy support to expand telehealth services.

Discussion

Our findings suggest that telehealth adoption in rural primary care can significantly improve healthcare access and patient outcomes. The quantitative results demonstrate both increased utilization and improved clinical measures, including better control of chronic conditions. The qualitative data support these trends by highlighting key benefits that patients and providers found meaningful, such as reduced travel and flexible scheduling.

Nevertheless, the study also identifies persistent barriers. Broadband limitations and a lack of digital literacy contribute to uneven telehealth adoption. Providers expressed the need for streamlined platforms and training programs to reduce the technology burden. Policy-level factors—especially around reimbursement parity for telehealth vs. in-person visits—also remain crucial to sustaining telehealth programs.

Conclusion

Key Takeaways:

1. Improved Outcomes: Telehealth use correlates with better patient outcomes for chronic conditions in rural communities.
2. Barriers Remain: Infrastructure, digital literacy, and reimbursement policies continue to hinder widespread telehealth adoption.
3. Policy Implications: Expanding broadband access, providing robust training for patients and providers, and ensuring reimbursement parity can help sustain and scale telehealth services in rural areas.

The findings underscore the value of telehealth in addressing rural healthcare gaps. With ongoing efforts to expand digital infrastructure and supportive policy frameworks, telehealth can become a mainstay of rural healthcare delivery.

Policy Implications

1. Broadband Investments: Federal and state programs should invest in broadband expansion to ensure high-speed internet access for rural communities.
2. Provider Support: State and federal policymakers can create incentives or grants for telehealth infrastructure and staff training to help providers transition to virtual care models.
3. Payment and Reimbursement Reform: Ensuring parity between telehealth and in-person reimbursement can encourage clinicians to offer virtual services without financial losses.
4. Consumer Education: Public health campaigns can raise awareness of telehealth benefits, offering user-friendly guides to help patients navigate virtual platforms.

Limitations

1. Generalizability: Results may not apply to all rural communities, as the clinics in our study may differ from those in other regions with distinct demographic or socioeconomic characteristics.
2. Selection Bias: Patients who chose telehealth could differ in key characteristics (e.g., technological aptitude) from those preferring in-person care.
3. Data Scope: We relied on EHR records from four clinics, which may not capture the broader spectrum of telehealth utilization in other healthcare settings.

References

1. Bureau of Health Workforce. Designated Health Professional Shortage Areas Statistics. Health Resources & Services Administration, 2022.
2. Mehrotra A, Chernew M, Linetsky D, Hatch H, Cutler D. The Impact of COVID-19 on Outpatient Visits in 2020. Health Affairs. 2020;39(11):2014–2023.
3. Kruse CS, Krowski N, Rodriguez B, Tran L, Vela J, Brooks M. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e016242.
4. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. COVID-19 Emergency Declaration Blanket Waivers for Health Care Providers. 2021.